Welcome back Cagesiders! The first time around we graded mostly on an individual's career in totality. For these reevaluations, try to focus on the talent's work mainly in 2014. Did they have a career defining moment? Did one of their loathes disappear from their original evaluation? The idea here is to see if each pick is trending up or down based on their body of work in 2014.
If this is your first read with this series, here's the deal: We are looking to hyper-critique an individual (or move/match) and try to pinpoint what they are great and terrible at doing. It's okay to pull out the snark card in your responses. In fact, it's encouraged!
After enough people respond, I will organize what are the best and worst traits of Dean Ambrose and compile an evaluation post later in the day. Also, don't worry if you have the same answers as others, the point is to figure out common denominators in each evaluation. If today's pick has multiple gimmicks, they are all fair game to be evaluated.
The two questions for you are:
What one thing do you consistently love about Dean Ambrose?
What one thing do you consistently loathe about Dean Ambrose?
For reference: Dean Ambrose Evaluation