FanPost

Title Talk: WWE Network Championship

In this series, we create championships or accomplishments and explain how or why they would be useful to the WWE.

The WWE Network Championship has been coined by the IWC for a while now and it makes sense why it would be useful to both the WWE Network and the roster as well.

With only a couple of singles titles in WWE right now, Superstars would jump with joy if there were more opportunities for them to wear some gold around their waste.

Here are 3 ways in which the WWE Network Championship could carry some importance.

1. It could be the defended between the lower mid-card to the higher mid-card from guys like Zack Ryder, Xavier Woods, Adam Rose, Damien Sandow, R-Truth, Heath Slater, and others like Alberto Del Rio, Seamus, Fandango, Ryback, Curtis Axel, Kofi Kingston, and Bo Dallas as it would be a tier lower than the IC and US titles. Since the titles might get unified anyway, it keeps a portion of the roster still busy in a title chase.

2. It could be defended on Main Event, Superstars, NXT and Pay-per-views as it should only be defended on the network but still make its regular appearances on Raw and Smackdown. This could help draw viewers to those shows as the title can be defended at least once a month or more on either live television on Main Event or a PPV, or bring excitement to taped shows like NXT and Superstars.

3. It's a type of title that the WWE has never experienced before, so the level of prestige for it relies solely on the rivalries and superstars in them. Think of it as WWE's own version of a Television Championship only a tad cooler.

Bonus: It could also count as a tertiary championship and help superstars become Grand Slam Champions, a title not popular in modern day WWE.

The WWE Network Championship could open doors for the network and superstars eager to win some gold, as well as keep the WWE universe entertained.

That's it for Title Talk! Stop by tomorrow for the next edition and a whole new title.

The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Cageside Seats readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cageside Seats editors or staff.