1. The Rock shows up once in a while and people complain about him taking someone else's spot at WM. Lesnar shows up once in a while and people complain about him taking someone else's spot at WM. HHH and Taker show up once in a while and take up a WM spot, and no one complains...
Now obviously, HHH is working at WWE, and Taker has a lot of respect... but shouldn't the Rock also have enough respect?
If the complaint against Rocky is about him not working as hard as the other guys and showing up every week, then shouldn't people be upset at HHH and Taker for the SAME reason?
I realize there are other things involved (like I mentioned above), but that argument doesn't hold up. The Rock probably works harder on his wrestling than any of the three mentioned. I'm not trying to take the Rock's side here. It could be anyone.
2. Punk vs Cena, Piledriver, Powerbomb. Was the match epic because of the entire match or was it epic because Punk threw down a piledriver and Cena concocted up a powerbomb (which is more surprising than the Punk Piledriver).
No question that the match was great, but was it epic just because of those two moves?
Let's say Ziggler starts throwing down piledrivers and powerbombs, woult that make his matches great, or was it because it was just a one time thing.
If a one time thing, I guess we should forget about seeing those again, because if Cena adds a powerbomb to his arsenal of 5 moves then we won't consider it to be epic anymore.
I don't feel strongly about either of the two topics, I just wanted objective thoughts from csseaters.