The undertaker vs drew mcintyre at wrestlemania 28???
by rahul106 on Jan 30, 2012 5:17 AM EST
Email
Print
most of u will say its crazy idea but i have my points.....
1.The wrestler who will defeat undertaker will become icon or face of wwe for many years
2. wwe will not going to defeat undertaker with some old guy like triple h or already a top superstar like john cena.
3. wwe need a young wrestle who can work in wwe for many years like drew mcintyre.
4. when looking at the past of drew mcintyre from wikipedia it is clear that sheamus and mcintyre are equally talented.
5. sheamus is a 2 time champion and a royal rumble winner while mcintyre is not in the main event.
6.wwe is not pushed mcintyre maybe they are waiting for right time.
7.drew mcintyre is a chosen one so may be he is the chosen one to defeat taker at wrestlemania .
8.most important thing is that undefeated streak of drew mcintyre in smackdown is ended by undertaker.
9.why wwe chose undertaker to end drew mcintyres streak???
10. it may be possible that undertaker vs mcintyre at wrestlemania 29 in 2013.
The FanPosts are solely the subjective opinions of Cageside Seats readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cageside Seats editors or staff.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
god I would hope
taker pulls sway and veto that shit. but he has always wanted to elevate new talent so maybe?
He knows the guy with the bandage on his ass is going no were. Were you going fucking no were
by Elstriko on Jan 30, 2012 6:25 AM EST via Android app reply actions
Undertaker wants to elevate new talent? You must be drinking Paul Bearer’s special Kool-aid.
Suum Cuique
by Rawuncutnxrated on Feb 4, 2012 8:12 PM EST up reply actions
You have to have someone that makes you think he can end the streak
Because if Ric Flair couldn’t do it, then who can?
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"Clemson should've stopped turning the ball over" Dana Holgorsen when asked about running up the score in the Orange Bowl
I think it needs to be a credible threat. Which they may be able to build him up into by 2013 but I think two months after having him lose to Ezekiel Jackson and Santino freaking Morelli is a litte hard to do.
Obviously there is the Rock-Cena, WHC and WWEC matches but Taker’s match should be pretty heavily advertised as well. I disagree that they won’t let a top talent do it, if they even decide to end the streak. You could use the other logic and say that they want to make sure it is someone who will give a spectacular match and is more likely to be able to be the face of the company.
Some of your points are ok but some could apply to alot of people. Only 7, 8, and 9 are really things that you could use as arguments that apply to just Drew.
by The Name is Dalton on Jan 30, 2012 11:16 AM EST reply actions
and 8 and 9
are basically the same thing. One is just questioning why the other occurred. #10 could apply to anyone. #1 is just a statement, not a reason for or against Drew.
by The Name is Dalton on Jan 30, 2012 11:17 AM EST up reply actions
I actually agree with you.
This is pathetic & pitiful. To think that the WWe would invest that heavily in Drew when he can’t get himself over after the owner of the company intro’d him to the world, is insane. Drew would be lucky to be employed by WWe come WM 29.
Suum Cuique
by Rawuncutnxrated on Feb 4, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
The one & only..
logical choice is Randy Orton. I outlined why before, I won’t waste everyone’s time, including my own rehashing it out. There is no other who is credible and still young but a veteran to do it.
Suum Cuique
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
