Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

WWE responds to Republican Christopher Shays attack with the same tired talking points

Linda McMahon is too busy showing off her common touch to deal with accusations about her shady pro wrestling past.  (Photo via Sgt. R.K. Blue at Wikimedia Commons)

As we reported here just over ten days ago, the race to choose the next Republican candidate for the retiring Joe Liebermann's Connecticut Senate seat is heating up, with Linda McMahon's main rival, Christopher Shays, aggressively going after her Achilles' heel of dead former WWE wrestlers.

Unsurprisingly Linda, who wants to distance herself from the baggage of her shady pro wrestling past, has not personally responded to the attack. After she came off like an aloof and cold executive in her response to Lance Cade's death at age 29 from heart failure in August 2010 during her first run for Senate, Linda has always allowed WWE spokesmen like Ed Patru and Robert Zimmerman to speak on her behalf and correct such "factual inaccuracies" to the Connecticut media.

So here we go again, with Robert Zimmerman once again being called upon to stand up for WWE's "650 employees and approximately 300,000 fans in Connecticut" by writing a strongly worded letter to Shays telling him to knock off the baseless accusations and using the same tired company talking points that they always roll out under such circumstances. Let's go through them one by one in detail after the jump.

Star-divide

  • Implying that he is a hypocrite because he once visited WWE's Headquarters in Stamford and actively supported their non-partisan voter-registration campaign dubbed "Smackdown! Your Vote" in the past.
  • Arguing that their entertainment business doesn't promote bullying, as Shays claimed, because of their recent Be A Star anti-bullying initiative. It is worth noting that WWE only launched this crusade rather belatedly in the summer of 2011 after the company came under tremendous heat from GLAAD in the run up to WrestleMania 27 for scripting top babyface John Cena to tell several homophobic jokes at The Rock's and The Miz's expense. Even now, Cena's behaviour is often not befitting a true role model for his young fans that look up to him.
  • In response to Shays' characterisation to the Associated Press that WWE peddles "soft-core porn", Zimmerman pointed to the TV-PG rating that all WWE broadcast television programming currently abides by, which is true, but wasn't the case during the peak of the company's popularity in the Attitude Era.
  • Disputing Shays' claim that WWE has "got over 41 people 50 years and younger who've died in their jobs", by accurately though misleadingly stating that only "five wrestlers have passed away while under contract" and "according to coroner reports, one individual died by accident, one by suicide and three by heart disease". Of course, that doesn't tell the whole story.
  • The company was clearly negligent in the stunt that caused Owen Hart's death and they lost a wrongful death lawsuit to Martha Hart soon afterwards, but not without using every dirty tactic in the book to undermine her effort to get justice.
  • In an independent post-mortem examination of his brain, Chris Benoit was diagnosed to have had the degenerative neurological disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) at the time of his suicide. Moreover, his autopsy revealed that he had hugely elevated levels of testosterone in his system despite being subject to company drug testing and, in an under reported story at the time, that his heart, liver and spleen were all severely enlarged, which would likely have led to heart disease in later life.
  • Eddy Guerrero's autopsy listed his steroid usage as a contributing cause to his arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which has since been sealed by his widow Vickie Guerrero, who, not so coincidentally, has worked for WWE off and on as a heel manager ever since his premature death.
  • Similarly, Brian Pillman's autopsy cited his cocaine usage as a contributing factor to his coronory artery disease and his widow, Melanie King, strongly believed that his addiction to pain pills and usage of ephedrine, human growth hormone and steroids played a role in his heart attack, something the coroner wouldn't rule out.
  • Strangely, Rick McGraw who died while working for the company on November 1st, 1985 is not included in the list, as the fifth name would have to be Russ Haas, with the only conclusion being that he wasn't mentioned because he wasn't under contract at the time. As Bret Hart discussed in his autobiography Hitman: My Real Life in the Cartoon World of Wrestling, the circumstances surrounding his death reflected badly on life in the WWF at the time: "Every night he'd swallow a handful of Placidyls and wind up passed out face down in his dinner.... The cause of his death was labelled a heart attack, but we all knew his heart had given out under deadly dosages of downers."
  • Finally, though only six wrestlers died in their WWE jobs before the age of 50, if you include the deaths of former employees into the tally, then 41 people is a close to accurate statistic, many of whom died from causes related to the drug addictions they picked up or continued while employed by WWE. It's like a tobacco company arguing that their products can't be blamed for a long term smoker contracting lung cancer because they quit smoking before getting the disease.

Comment 15 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There is some legitimacy to this counter-point
Disputing Shays’ claim that WWE has “got over 41 people 50 years and younger who’ve died in their jobs”, by accurately though misleadingly stating that only “five wrestlers have passed away while under contract” and “according to coroner reports, one individual died by accident, one by suicide and three by heart disease”. Of course, that doesn’t tell the whole story.

Like you said, its not the whole story, but the WWE cannot be held responsible for people formerly employed by them passing away. A fair share of those guys were let go specifically because of drug abuse problems.

by hfl2013 on Jan 24, 2012 11:00 PM EST reply actions  

hit post too soon

Drugs are sadly a huge part of the wrestling world. While I’m sure the WWE, especially in the past, hasn’t discouraged things like steroid use, I’m pretty sure you can go to just about any wrestling promotion and find just as many if not more wrestlers using steroids and other drugs. The WWE can only do so much to stop a problem that is rampant in the sports world. For a lot of these wrestlers that passed away, they most likely took steroids and other drugs well before they came to the WWE. And how many spent more of their time at WCW/ECW and other promotions?

by hfl2013 on Jan 24, 2012 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course, WWE aren’t completely to blame and their track record is a lot better than WCW, ECW and TNA as major promotions go, but they were the promotion that pushed physique above all else and set a really hellish travel schedule for their performers in the mid 1980s, which helped set the ball rolling for the culture of death within the industry. I think the most damning indiction of the company is that once they had finally obtained a monopoly hold on the industry when they bought WCW that they weren’t proactive to the problem and start drug testing then. Instead they waited until Eddy Guerrero died.

by Keith Harris on Jan 25, 2012 6:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I guess personal responsibility plays no part in any of this. They were wrestlers, so they needed the drugs in some capacity to continue their lively hood. These guys that use steroids, its fine.. they live life fast and die with a bunch of money & fame that means nothing. I’m not trying to have a cold heart.. but outside of Benoit.. the only ones these things have hurt is themselves. Everyone wants to point the finger at someone else, but these guys aren’t stupid.. they knew what they were doing, they knew the risk, they knew the reward. Why does a company have to be big brother & police these things for grown men? I get that these things are illegal, but lets say they weren’t… would such drug tests need to be in place at that point? I don’t see Hollywood making people drop piss tests to be in movies & tv shows. Its not like anyone is gaining a competitive advantage.. after all it is scripted… Congress would certainly want to get into baseball, but why wrestling? The wins & loses mean absolutely nothing.

I’m not saying that drugs should be legalized. And this is more counter point & offering some other perspectives. This is a complex situation, its not black & white.

Suum Cuique

by Rawuncutnxrated on Jan 25, 2012 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

When the person who decides who wins and loses and who gets a push makes his decision based on large part on the quality of someone’s physique, then there is a huge competitive advantage in juicing.

by Keith Harris on Jan 25, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions  

That is a very good point. But the man decides to be in that profession, and that man ultimately has to make a decision.. Does the company hold sole responsibility for him making that decision?

A lot of people in life and business are rewarded for taking short cuts. It doesn’t mean you should take that short cut yourself & if you do, its done at your own peril. Wrestling is a unique biz that does make decisions of strength & looks.

Suum Cuique

by Rawuncutnxrated on Jan 25, 2012 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

It is up for the leaders of the profession

To make it as appealing and safe as possible. It is not right to say that if wrestling is killing people, it is the wrestlers fault. If it was a small amount of people that were turning to drugs and dying prematurely, then yes it is up to the individual. But with such a large sample you can trace it back to a root cause. WWE is not big brother, but it should protect its workers from killing themselves.

So go forth, my brethren, and proceed to mark the f*ck out

by C. J. Bradford on Jan 25, 2012 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Then should Hollywood also do that? Because there have been significant deaths there as well. And I know that actors, the higher ups, are often hired by one filming company, like Miramax or someone else. They hold the exclusive contracts for that particular actor.

I just don’t know how much blame you can access to a business. It isn’t like going to work in a mine where the worker related deaths happen during business hours, such as mine collapse. It isn’t like people who worked and got asbestos poisoning.

I do think these are good points, and I like the conversation because I am trying to figure this out for myself. I cannot pin point how I feel about all this, its confusing to me. That’s the only reason why I continue to talk about it is I am hoping to find a place to stand on this, and I cannot find it at this point.

Suum Cuique

by Rawuncutnxrated on Jan 25, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I do think Hollywood should do it

Thats why they have unions and the like. The closest comparison is stunt doubles, who are very protected but are able to go out and make a loving doing what they love.

I I think it is pretty close to mine workers. If it was just a few people, then it’s just a few people’s problems. But since so many wrestlers have died young and due to similar circumstances, then action should be taken

I enjoy these debates, too. I know that I believe WWE should do something, but I am still trying to figure how far they should go. It helps to have an opposite side to balance my knee jerk reactions

So go forth, my brethren, and proceed to mark the f*ck out

by C. J. Bradford on Jan 25, 2012 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

linda should hit back with a negative ad targeting shays past

I mean his great great great great grandfather started a rebellion against the federal government for god’s sake.

Writer for www.cartilagefreecaptain.com

follow me on twitter @theroosevelts

by theroosevelts on Jan 25, 2012 10:32 AM EST reply actions  

Oooh, obscure history reference. Well done!

by King Oskar on Jan 25, 2012 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Why is Linda running again?

She spent all this money the first time, lost, and is going back for more?

Can a McMahon EVER accept defeat?

It still doesn’t make sense why she’s so hell-bent on being a United States Senator. Granted, its an easy job: Free healthcare, lots of perks, and your only requirement is to vote yes or no.

Is the Corleone family trying to become legitimate?

I’m not a CT resident but I know its a blue state like most of New England and the only Republicans that get elected up there are moderates.

She seems to be running a moderate campaign (and not obsessing over God, gays, guns, Mexicans, abortion, evolution, etc.), but I really don’t see the appeal other than her running on “I’m a female job creator.”

By the way, Madame, Michelle Obama you are NOT! Please cover up those biceps. :-p

by CAxlRose on Jan 25, 2012 2:28 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I actually go to school inCT

And it is more of a right leaning state, at least economically. A “job creator” is a solid platform to run on here. Lieberman was DINO, and his last term was an independent because the Dems overplayed their hand and forced him out of the party.

I personally like Linda, and think she would do a good job in the Senate. But this is something she does have to answer for. The fact that she will not have a dialogue about it is troubling. People died working for her. If she is going to ignore it, then she shouldn’t be elected. She’s going to lose anyways cause of her name, but I think that’s a bad reason to lose.

So go forth, my brethren, and proceed to mark the f*ck out

by C. J. Bradford on Jan 25, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Because, like plenty of other big businessmen/women, she's powerhungry

Shifting from business to politics, it’s a new kind of power. Now she and her family won’t be the one offering money to make backhanded deals- they’ll be the ones taking the grease.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!" Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
Ryder or Riot #WWWYKI

AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 458 posts (08/24/11)
3rd Place- 2011 AAOP Contest | 1st place- 2012 AAOP Contest

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 25, 2012 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I just get the sense that this wouldn't be an issue if she were running out of a state in the Deep South or the Midwest

but in most places in the country, the pro wrestling business is seen as just barely better than the porn industry, generally speaking. This is the sort of tawdry stuff that will stick to a candidate like that, and honestly no one is going to take her executive experience seriously because of the company that she runs.

This is the reason that Vince is so hard up to get away from the pro wrestling business and thus be seen as a Hollywood exec/pro sports exec/anything but a wrestling carny barker. It seems like Vince realizes the limitations of being labeled as a leader in the pro wres biz; why doesn’t Linda realize this as well?

by Razztopia on Jan 25, 2012 5:04 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"Behind you there may be one, or there may be many, waiting to stick a knife in your back. But you don't have to worry about me ... I'll shoot you right between the eyes." -- Kevin Nash

The General

Solidsnake_small Geno Mrosko

Editors

Small Keith Harris

Bane2_small Jesse Holland

File1684_small Sergio Hernandez