Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

The CM Punk vs. John Cena SummerSlam PPV buy rate hits rock bottom

The look on CM Punk's face when he heard the news about the SummerSlam PPV buy rate.  Photo via upload.wikimedia.org.

As I detailed two days ago, many people believe that the CM Punk angle jumped the shark soon after the Money In The Bank pay-per-view (PPV).  If that was the case, then it would be reflected in the SummerSlam PPV buy rate, since the show was headlined by CM Punk vs. John Cena in a bout to decide the undisputed WWE champion with Triple H as the special referee.  Even the Money In The Bank number was not as impressive as one would have thought given all the online buzz at the time, but at least it was still up significantly from the same show last year.  If WWE's handling of the angle had done no damage, then one would have expected SummerSlam to comfortably beat last year's number too.  Unfortunately that wan't the case.

Indeed, the preliminary estimates for this year's SummerSlam are almost embarrassingly bad.  As PWTorch reports, the initial estimate is 301,000 buys, which would break down into 190,000 domestic and 111,000 international.  To put the number into perspective, last year's initial estimate was a disappointing 350,000 total buys and 210,000 domestic, but even that mediocre number ended up being downgraded to a paltry 339,000 worldwide buys and 203,000 domestic.  So as things stand, this year's SummerSlam did 11.2-percent less buys worldwide and 6.4-percent less buys domestically, which would be rock bottom for WWE's traditional second or third biggest PPV of the year.  You would have to go back to the WWF's darkest days in the mid 1990s to find a SummerSlam that drew worse, at a time when the PPV universe was much smaller.

This is terrible news for CM Punk, who is probably going to be made the scapegoat for this atrocious number, but the heat should be on the creative team, not just for dropping the ball on such a hot angle, but also for doing such a lousy job with the rest of the line up.  With less than a week to go before the show only four matches had been announced, none of which, other than the main event, was better than the standard fare that could be seen on any old pay per view or even for free on TV.  Heads should roll for this, but it shouldn't be Punk's.

Fortunately SummerSlam's decline in PPV business should be more than made up for by a big Survivor Series number.  Survivor Series has the potential to be the biggest non-WrestleMania PPV in recent memory thanks to The Rock's first wrestling match in almost eight years.  But it's imperative for WWE to find a way to draw on PPV without The Rock's help, especially as his help will mean less and less as the novelty of seeing him wrestle will decline with each appearance.  Given that WWE PPV business has largely been declining for the last decade, I'm not confident that the current creative team is up to the task of turning the sinking ship around.

Comment 11 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

happy trails punk, see you in the dark matches real soon

somebody find Michael Hayes and run him over with a car this kind of shit is a travesty

Writer for www.cartilagefreecaptain.com

follow me on twitter @theroosevelts

by theroosevelts on Sep 26, 2011 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Is Streaming Killing the Buyrates?

Maybe I’m way off base, but I get a sense that a large portion of the IWC—the biggest supporters of the CM Punk angle—are the same people who generally find free streams of PPVs and RAW. If that’s the case, the WWE isn’t really getting any sort of accurate read at all. I’d think they need to stop focusing on the raw numbers and pay more attention to the actual response things are getting. People get their media in too many untrackable formats anymore to get any sort of legit information from old fashioned “buyrates” statistics.

by tkatt00 on Sep 26, 2011 9:44 PM EDT reply actions  

PPV Buyrates...

… are all that matter for a PPV. It’s a business and people watching for free mean absolutely nothing. They might as well not be watching for all the difference it makes.

Buyrates are the only metric by which to evaluate a PPV.

‎"My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world."

- Jack Layton

by Worldisart on Sep 26, 2011 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Has anyone considered the truth in this buyrate debate?

The truth is without the Cena/Punk/HHH angle MITB and Summerslam would have been absolute bombs. Punk actually halted the decline of business.

Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...

by Major on Sep 26, 2011 9:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Well that would be looking at things optimistically, which can't be done here

The problem with Summerslam is obvious, it was Cena-Punk with Triple H and then nothing else. Christian and Orton had another great match, but it was like the 5th one in a row with the same outcome as always. Beyond that, there were some good matches, but nothing that was heavily promoted.

"In fact, most of these free-swinging Padres couldn’t hit Dock’s funky palm ball. I threw it often. But by then, also, the first acid distractions entered: the TV flickered; the cracks in the wall started to move; the hand soap started to breathe — those sorts of things. Plus I was drawn to the outdoor garden between innings. Rain was near, I sensed." - A.J. Daulerio

by Gdawg on Sep 27, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's really not an optomistic view at all

Heading into the summer, ratings were already falling and PPV buys were already crashing the CM punk angle kept fans, who weren’t gonna spend a single dollar on another WWE, ppv interested and curious enough to buy those shows. Do I have data to support that? No, but given the sheer amount of buzz and interest it seems to me that Punk was able to re-capture the hardcore wrestling fan but failed to capture new viewers. The point is I believe CM Punk actually staved off an even sharper more pronounced decline of WWE ppv and house show business. Imagine what WWE business would be like without Punk in the fed and Cena playing his superhuman role all summer. (#Toiletflushing)

Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...

by Major on Sep 27, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Punk angle was worth about 40,000 buys in North America at Money In The Bank, but I don’t think the SummerSlam buy rate was affected by it. I think the original main event of Cena vs. Del Rio for SummerSlam would have done in the region of 300,000 buys too.

by Keith Harris on Sep 27, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe it didn't affect the buy rate much

but I think its a very good point that is being overlooked. Punk might not be bringing in a ton of new fans, but he is keeping the current ones interested especially the fans that got tired of SuperCena.

And like others have mentioned before, things don’t happen overnight. if punk keeps people engaged when they would have otherwise tuned out, then it gives the wwe time to build some depth behind him and cena. Guys like Rhodes, Bryan, Ziggler, and Sin Cara are just a few who are starting to get there. When you look at guys like the Rock, Stone Cold, Foley, etc., they needed time to not only perfect their characters, but to be trusted by mcmahon to be main event guys

"In fact, most of these free-swinging Padres couldn’t hit Dock’s funky palm ball. I threw it often. But by then, also, the first acid distractions entered: the TV flickered; the cracks in the wall started to move; the hand soap started to breathe — those sorts of things. Plus I was drawn to the outdoor garden between innings. Rain was near, I sensed." - A.J. Daulerio

by Gdawg on Sep 27, 2011 11:51 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I like CM Punk, and do agree they massively screwed up the angle after MITB…

But does anyone else wonder just how highly we would think of the angle if MITB happened to have been anywhere other than Chicago? How much is our impression of how hot the angle was at the time influenced by how hot that crowd was? And how much did the angle itself (as opposed to Punk’s popularity in Chicago) cause that crowd heat?

I say all this because I don’t remember the crowds at the Raws leading up to MITB being super-hot.

But with all that said, people seem to always forget that it took nearly a full year after the 3:16 speech for Austin to become a true main event player. And it was nearly 2 full years after the 3:16 speech (and a giant pile of money thrown at Mike Tyson, and the coincidence of Montreal to give Austin a foil) before business really exploded. As late as December 1997, ratings and buyrates were still poor, as they fell off once the Hart Foundation/USA angle cooled off.

People, fans and WWE execs included, need to stop looking for business to turn around in 3 weeks, and start looking for long-term solutions. Wanting business to turn around instantly is what caused them to rush the Punk angle. Ideally, they need to be building everything they are doing toward Wrestlemania, which will have a lot of eyes on it because of Rock/Cena. If you can show off a hot product then, you have a chance.

by mb78 on Sep 27, 2011 12:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Even if the buy rates weren't as high as they want

the audience has had Punk’s back since day one when he returned. Surely, that’s gotta count for something when the WWE assesses the damage and tries to figure out who’s to blame.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!" Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 458 posts (08/24/11)
3rd Place- 2011 AAOP Contest

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 27, 2011 1:48 AM EDT reply actions  

The buildup to this PPV was done poorly outside Punk and Cena.

There was only 4 or 5 matches advertised for SSlam and the two main events were, in fact, rematches from the previous ppv MITB. Who can blame the fans for not shelling out money for only 4 advertised matches?

~Texas Massacre '09~
Follow me @The_Heat_
Friend me TheHeat
Google+ me TheHeat

by TheHeat on Sep 27, 2011 4:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"Behind you there may be one, or there may be many, waiting to stick a knife in your back. But you don't have to worry about me ... I'll shoot you right between the eyes." -- Kevin Nash

The General

Solidsnake_small Geno Mrosko

Editors

Small Keith Harris

Bane2_small Jesse Holland

File1684_small Sergio Hernandez