Mick Foley says a match with The Undertaker at WrestleMania "makes sense"
Mick Foley's appearances on Wrestling Observer Radio are always highly newsworthy and topical (see this article about his previous show where he spoke frankly about the issue of concussions and his own neurological problems). He didn't disappoint last Wednesday either in a show people should go out of there way to listen to. The highlights included:
- Foley made it very clear even beating around the bush that he expects to return to WWE within the next several months, as has already been reported on Cageside Seats. Assuming he has another good match left in him, he says a WrestleMania match with The Undertaker "makes a lot of sense" and even joked that his eight year old son Hughie once asked him whether he was the man to break the streak. He also expressed interest in working with some of the newer WWE stars like The Miz and CM Punk.
- I think Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez dropped the ball slightly by not politely probing him whether one more match, particularly on the grand stage of WrestleMania 28 where he would feel compelled to deliver a memorable, show stealing performance, was in his best interests, given his well documented history of head trauma leading to permanent neurological damage.
- Surprisingly, he said he hasn't ruled out doing announcing for the company, despite Vince McMahon's abrasive handling of his announcers by shouting orders down their ear pieces and dressing them down afterwards if they screwed up being the straw that broke the camel's back that led to him leaving WWE in September 2008. He looks back fondly on his short-lived Smackdown announcing run with Jim Ross and wonders what might have been if he hadn't took everything so personally.
- There was a fascinating discussion over the similarities between learning how to become an effective stand up comedian today with learning how to become a good professional wrestler in the dying territories of the late 1980s, because both involve working an audience.
- When asked how the CM Punk angle has panned out since Money In The Bank, Foley gave a very political answer: "Aww man, we have to see how it all plays out, I'm going to try to resist my urge to be critical of storylines for a company I'll likely be working for again."
- He mentioned that one of the creative sticking points with TNA was their handling of the Knockouts division where the women are regularly scripted to use demeaning language against each other, due his high profile work with the charity RAINN, the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network. Management didn't take too kindly to Foley insisting they knock off the women-hating insults. There is some irony here, as Mick Foley was outspoken in his defence of TNA's hypocritical "Eliminate The Hate" anti-bullying campaign before being made the storyline Network Executive in charge of Impact's content.
- Foley discussed being involved with a benefit show for Shane Helms, who recently suffered catastrophic leg and facial injuries in a near fatal motorcycle accident. Helms has asked that the money raised will go to producing a public service announcement. Foley didn't come out and say exactly what that PSA would be for, but how he talked it definitely sounded like it would warn people of the dangers of driving while impaired by alcohol or drugs. Indeed, Helms was recently arrested for a DWI stemming from the crash. A nice gesture by Mick and I'm glad to hear that one wrestler has learnt his lesson about DUIs, hopefully Matt Hardy and Kurt Angle follow suit.
- Coming soon you can see the whole Foley family on Celebrity Wife Swap, where he claims he underwent a physical makeover and his wife got to stay with the best looking guy in the business, which should make for one of the most fun appearances by a wrestler on a mainstream show.
- In closing, he admitted regretting not doing a match with Vince McMahon at WrestleMania X-Seven over a stubborn insistence that he had retired, which caused him a lot of heat at the time. I'd say, given that would have been a relatively easy smoke and mirrors match, much easier than having a serious match with a top star eleven years on.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You get bashed in the head that many times
A lot of things start to make sense.
Please Mick, stay home. Honestly for your own sake.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
If nothing else
This really speaks to the WWE’s assessment of its current roster if they’re seriously considering having Foley vs Taker at WM28. Combined with Rock vs Cena, and the oft-rumored Austin vs Punk matches, the upper card will be filled with guys who were past their prime a decade ago.
by Jonathan Loesche on Sep 12, 2011 10:19 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Screw Taker.
He needs to put over Miz or Rhodes at Mania.
by TrailerParkTrash on Sep 12, 2011 1:20 PM EDT via mobile reply actions 2 recs
He could put over them, or Punk.. but I think the absolute most logical course would be Orton. Cena may get the nod.. but Orton I think has the biggest upside… and he can go heel and be over against a face Taker.
by Rawuncutnxrated on Sep 12, 2011 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Better to elevate someone who needs it...
…or has the potential. Cena or Orton don’t need a win over Taker or Foley.
by TrailerParkTrash on Sep 12, 2011 9:01 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
But by bring back heel Orton...
You can add more names to the Legend Killer’s resume. With how they have built Orton up, it makes some sense, whether you like it or not
Makes sense for your bank account but that’s about it. It does nothing for the fans; older fans don’t want to see Foley give anything less than 100% and newer fans are going to wonder why people thought he was so great.
TrailerParkTrash has it right. Taker needs to call it quits because his sporadic appearances aren’t cutting it. Put someone over with clean but close call Taker win and then have him retire on Raw. If Kane is back by then maybe have him work a good story with whomever was in the match against Taker.
by mariobatalivsmarkhenry on Sep 12, 2011 1:59 PM EDT reply actions
I was thinking the same things… makes sense 15 yrs ago as well. But today.. unless Mick works his ass off & gets in really good shape.. like when he was against Sting.. which is great shape for Mick.. then its just going to suck.
by Rawuncutnxrated on Sep 12, 2011 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
What's better for business than...
…putting someone over in their last match? Taker can give back.
by TrailerParkTrash on Sep 12, 2011 9:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Mick can do whatever he wants, except wrestle
Hopefully wifey will beat that into his head.
Release...the KITTIES!
Head injuries aside
The “Mankind has ’Taker’s number” aura has long since dissipated and from that angle, there are a number of guys that I’d rather see try to take down the Undertaker at WrestleMania. The problem is that a good handful of those guys (Sting and Goldberg included) are highly unlikely to sign with the WWE.
I’m hoping they run Cena/’Taker in a couple years, as that would really put some doubt in who might win.
I also would rather not see Taker lose the streak, both from a fan’s standpoint and from the standpoint that the only guys who I would buy beating Taker at WM don’t need the win anyway (Cena, Orton come to mind). Other guys like Rhodes, Miz, etc., I like, but them beating Taker seems absurd. Plus I like the idea of a streak like that being the new benchmark for some main eventer in the future. There is more money in keeping the streak alive not only while Taker can still wrestle, but for future storylines related to other wrestlers trying to match or break the streak.
God, I hope not
The streak only works these days if there’s some perceived threat to it. That ship has long sailed in the case of Mick Foley. I love Mick and consider him one of my favorites, but facts are facts. He and Taker will never be able to recreate their old Hell in a Cell magic, so why even try. Plus, it’s The Grandest Stage of Them All, so anything less than Mick nearly killing himself against Taker will (sadly enough) only disappoint the masses.
Of course, I have no desire to see a Taker/HHH rematch either. Last year’s was good, and the one they had ten years before that was good too, but that’s enough for me.
Unfortunately, I’m not really sure WHO would be a viable option for Taker in 2012. That shows you how poorly the WWE has built new talent. Even the people they’ve pushed (Del Rio, etc.) wouldn’t be credible threats.
To whom?
Foley can’t wrestle anymore. He can fall, but does anyone really believe he can beat somebody? His body is woefully out of shape, even before you consider his injuries. It’s embarassing.
I don’t want to see Foley at all, even on commentary. This is a guy who has made statements he knows to be false, and when corrected, he gets all sulky and bitchy about it. See Botchamania 183 and One Night Stand ’05.
He needs to leave. Retire. Does he really bring anything to the table anymore?

by 
















