WWE 'Greatest Rivalries' DVD cover art for 'Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart' two-disc set
The WWE video library is so extensive they've dedicated plenty of resources to producing as many DVDs as possible. At first, home video business was booming, with plenty of interesting releases flying off the shelves in record numbers. But eventually, of course, the company ran out of truly compelling subject matter.
I mean, really, who wants to watch yet another movie centered around the self-destruction of the Hardy Boyz?
This year, though, they're bringing out the big guns in an effort to revive sales, one of which is this entry in the "Greatest Rivalries" series featuring perhaps the greatest of them all in Shawn Michaels vs. Bret Hart.
Set for release on Oct. 25, 2011, the two-disc set will cover their extensive issues throughout the years with plenty of matches between the two. Here's the Amazon description:
For more than a decade, Bret Hit Man Hart and Shawn Michaels engaged in perhaps the most storied rivalry in the history of sports entertainment, from their teams (the Hart Foundation and the Rockers), through battles for the Intercontinental Championship and the richest prize in the business, the WWE Championship. Their enmity spilled out of the ring, and led to the most infamous incident in the history of professional wrestling, The Montreal Screwjob. More than a decade later, the two men buried the hatchet as both are now WWE Hall of Famers. Now, for the first time ever, the two sit down together and rehash their intertwined destinies in Shawn Michaels vs. Bret Hart. These new, never-before-aired, interviews will shed new light and insight on issues and controversies fans have speculated about for years.
The thought of Michaels and Hart sitting down together and rehashing everything, including the "Montreal Screwjob" is absolutely delectable. Even after they made up when Hart returned to WWE last year, the tension when they were around each other was still palpable, though they claim it's now gone completely.
This also serves to spark debate over who exactly was the better of the two. That's a difficult question to answer when one considers the myriad of factors at play with what constitutes one wrestler being "better" than the other. Surely a set criteria is necessary and it's not a black and white issue by any stretch.
There was debate in the comments of an earlier post here on Cageside Seats on this very subject and I firmly came down on the side of "HBK." His workrate was unmatchable as was his ring generalship. He performed his best on the biggest stages while the lights were shining the brightest, even when he had a completely broken back.
Once he grew into himself and was allowed to cut loose, he was one of the best on the mic, too. His deficiencies are relegated to poor attitude and an unwillingness to "play the game," as it were. But being difficult to work with didn't affect how incredible his matches were. There is no one you could put in the ring opposite Michaels that wouldn't come out looking better for it.
The same cannot be said for Hart. His style of promo was so different and his delivery so stilted that he always came out looking badly over-matched and outgunned when he went head on against Michaels in a promo.
I won't criticize his work in the ring; I couldn't rightly do so and maintain any shred of credibility. He was one of the best technical wrestlers of all time. Hell, I can remember a match he had on Raw in 1994 against the 1-2-3 Kid (X-pac or Sean Waltman, whatever you want to call him) in which Bret made him look like a bona fide superstar, which is no small feat, especially at that time.
In fact, to show I'm not totally taking a dump on Hart, even with my strong leanings toward Michaels, I've included the Hart vs. 1-2-3 Kid match after the jump. And feel free to state your case as to who was the better of the top, Michaels or Hart, in the comments section.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
JR, Hart, HBK all together being honest and talking openly. I would love to see Austin and Rock do the same series. Vince and Bischoff would be awesome.
Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...
by Major on Aug 21, 2011 2:47 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I'd love to see Undertaker/Mankind
But since I’m sure Taker wouldn’t do it it wouldn’t be very fun.
by The so-called Beautiful on Aug 21, 2011 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Pretty awful...
Cover art, I must say.
How old is that picture of HBK? It looks like it’s from 1995.
by Sergio Hernandez on Aug 21, 2011 3:58 PM EDT reply actions
The point is to show when it started. If they used a current picture it wouldn’t do justice to the rivalry.
I hope they do Steamboat/Flair.
by Jon K. Wright on Aug 21, 2011 6:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Can't tell if that's sarcasm
but no. It’s not. Bret looked the same for almost his entire career. HBK aged like 10 years in 2 days.
Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
I guess...
You’re right. Hart is looking haggard as shit these days.
Must be from constantly patting himself on the back.
by Sergio Hernandez on Aug 21, 2011 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions
All I can see is that HBK Unibrow...
but the DVD set should be amazing though. I want to see this ASAP!
I used to always come down in the Hart camp (being a proud Canadian probably has something to do with it) however as history will show long-term it looks like HBK is the ‘better’ wrestler overall. Sure, Hart’s motorcycle injury has a lot to do with it but deciding to go to WCW along with just how horridly he was booked ends up tarnishing his legacy.
Plus, he had to wrestle Will Sasso. Good god.
Now, "wait 'till next year" looks like "Watch out for next year!" GO LEAFS GO!
Hart made amost everyone he worked with look better than they actually were.
My problem with HBK tends to be that he really only made people look good when he was sober. He bitched and complained about dropping the title, dropping the matches, and being self-serving in his feuds. Did he have great matches? Absolutely, and even more so after his conversion. While he still could be an ass (Watch his Hulk Hogan match), I have to give props to HBK because he came back from catastrophic injury and had great matches afterward.
Hart was never the same guy after Montreal. He’s bitter about his legacy and place in history, which affects his work ethic to this day. That being said, I saw Hart as a better wrestler who could beat anybody. He didn’t always win with his signature, like they do now. You really had to watch a Hart match because he could end it at anytime. He saw the approaches to angles and feuds much better than Michaels, and aside from Montreal, he never balked at dropping a match to ANYONE. Would HBK have jobbed to Sasso? Hell, they had a hard time getting it off him for Austin.
In the end, I give it to Michaels who had a better body of work through three decades.
Honeslty choosing between these 2
Is kind of like choosing an ice cream flavor. I don’t know that there’s really a right answer. Either way, its 2 of the absolute best of all time.
Personally, I prefer Bret. But I wouldn’t tell anybody they’re wrong for choosing Michaels either to be honest.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
His workrate was unmatchable as was his ring generalship. He performed his best on the biggest stages while the lights were shining the brightest, even when he had a completely broken back.
Wow that is just so wrong it’s hard for me not to go on a rant so i’ll just say that I disagree with what you stated very strongly. Saying HBK’s workrate and ring generalship was unmatched in a world where Bret Hart didn’t only exist but is what he’s known for just makes me shake my head.
To me it’s not really a debate, Bret was always the better of the two it wasn’t even close. While I respect Shawn in the ring and will give him his props as one of the top guys he wasn’t in Bret league and that’s not a bad thing there are very few who ever were. The stuff he could do in the ring was incredible and never needed the flash or the opponent to legitimize him. Bret could feud with anyone and make you care and believe and inside the ring brought the very best out of workers and he could do all that without the backstage politics and drama.
Finally yeah Shawn was better on the mic than Bret but he was hardly overmatched Hart because of his believability when he said something his words carried a weight that could cut right through Shawn’s bravado and bs. Like I said in the other thread it amazes me how Shawn’s legacy has grown thanks to the WWE always trying to shove him, and put him with the all-time greats when he really wasn’t that guy ever in his career no matter how hard Vince tried to push him.
I think Michaels gets the nod now due to greater longevity as a headliner producing high quality matches. That said, in their primes you could knock Shawn for his carry jobs often making it clear that he was doing all the work and that the spotlight was solely on him, while Bret’s carry jobs were more subtle and could lull the viewer into believing his opponent was actually good.
There are several factors to consider
one, which is not often mentioned, is that Bret is almost 10 years older than Shawn. His prime in ring time was between 1991-1995. During those years, like most have mentioned, his carry jobs of Kid, Diesel, Yoko, BamBam etc are stuff of legend. His ability to have a fantastic, well thought out match with ANYBODY sets him apart from Michaels, in my view. I see Hart as the last of a generation of “workers” and Michaels the first in a generation of “superstars”. They can both lay claim to the greatest of all time, it just depends on the criteria.
by thejasten on Aug 22, 2011 9:23 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Bret was the greatest ever
He could make matches an art form, michaels was all glitz and blam. Guys like bret are the reason the wrestling product went to shit. Everyone wants to have pyro and be shawn michaels.
I am vorn the unspeakable the skulls of those who defy me bleach in the suns of hundreds of worlds...... and you are
not having guys like bret i mean
I am vorn the unspeakable the skulls of those who defy me bleach in the suns of hundreds of worlds...... and you are
There's a reason one of them was called the showstopper
Because things like Pyro and glitz and blam are what the industry is all about.
"In fact, most of these free-swinging Padres couldn’t hit Dock’s funky palm ball. I threw it often. But by then, also, the first acid distractions entered: the TV flickered; the cracks in the wall started to move; the hand soap started to breathe — those sorts of things. Plus I was drawn to the outdoor garden between innings. Rain was near, I sensed." - A.J. Daulerio
I think that's a really good way of putting it
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook
by Billy Gomila on Aug 22, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
What gets me about the match in the video
Is you would NEVER have this sort of clean-finish match nowadays while one competitor was caught up in a major program. There’s almost always a run in, especially in these sort of title matches. Half of me was wondering when Owen and the Anvil would show to interfere.
Writer (and a handsome one at that),
And the Valley Shook

by 


















