The Destination X PPV; a promising card...and a test?
Yes, the poster for upcoming Destination X PPV from TNA Hulk Hogan's Retirement Fund Impact Wrestling does look suspiciously like the X-factor logo, doesn't it? Perhaps Vince Russo will come out to perform a version of "(And I Am Telling You), I'm Not Going." Maybe the frustrated TNA accounting department will sing a rendition of Babylon Zoo's "All the Money's Gone." I'd also like to suggest Matt Hardy returns from his suspension on the show and sings Electric Six's "Danger! High Voltage!" Then, for an encore, treat the live audience to his version of Demitri Martin's ""The Grapes Song".
But enough of the fantasy booking.
Yes, Impact Wrestling have a PPV coming up. But this isn't just your normal TNA PPV (you know, the ones with run-ins galore, countless swerves, and a completely drugged up Jeff Hardy staggering to the ring, putting in his attempt at being nominated for "Father of the Year." ) No: this is one dedicated to showcasing the best of TNA's long-suffering X-division. They've been maligned, stomped on, forgotten by head writer Vince Russo (who is too busy booking Emmy-Award winning storylines like the Winter/Angelina saga to give a crap about all these little guys) , branded "vanilla midgets" and told they can't draw by Eric Bischoff, the undisputed expert of who can or cannot draw in wrestling, of course. But now they have seemingly been extended an olive branch by management, and given their own PPV.
Interestingly, a few months ago Bischoff was even telling the disgruntled X division wrestlers that TNA were planning to revamp the flailing X division. Yeah...not even a stoned Brian Kendrick bought that one (he threatened to leave soon after but was talked into it, presumably with the promise of more food stamps at the end of the month) . But perhaps the Powers-That-Be at Impact Wrestling feel that after a botched attempt at rebranding (and sending out Karen Jarrett, of all people, to defend the company's creative direction), it might finally be time to prove that wrestling really does matter. Maybe Bischoff is beginning to realize that physical wrecks like Sting and Hogan can't carry the show forever (Okay, who are we kidding on that one? Bischoff will still be promoting Hogan vs Sting for years and decades to come, even if it means wheeling out their coffins and putting the pine boxes in the main event of Bound For Glory.)
Or is there something more sinister going on here? One TNA wrestler told me that this current PPV, rather than being a reward or a show of good faith, is actually a test. And a chance for the 90s nostalgia crew to prove once and for all these younger guys with all the fancy moves can't draw, and TNA are better sticking with the relics and woefully untalented bodybuilders like Crimson. They noted: "The anti-X-Division proponents in the company are looking to prove the X Division can't draw interest, money or buyrates, and if Destination X performs at the same level or worse than any other PPV, I think it will seriously hurt the future of the division." Eh, no pressure then guys.
The storylines in the build-up, as is always the case with Impact Wrestling, have been unspiring; the ring action, however, has been outstanding. Indeed, one of the few brights spots of Impact these days- amongst the clutter of lesbian zombies, insane Sting, and the achingly bland Gunner trying desperately to come off like a top star and failing miserably- has been the X division matches. Featuring the return of some long-gone performers (Low Ki, Matt Bentley, Austin Aries, Kid Kash) and some new faces (Shiima Xion) these exciting, jaw dropping displays have reminded fans just what made TNA a cult favourite in its earlier years, before the company simply abandoned it all to become it all to become WCW Nitro Mark II.
The current line-up from Impact Wrestling's website:
Brian Kendrick vs Abyss (c)
Christopher Daniels vs AJ Styles
The Return of the Ultimate X Match
Rob Van Dam vs Jerry Lynn
Samoa Joe vs Kazarian
The X-Division Contract Match
No-one is quite sure who the participants are for The Ultimate X match are. Yesterday, a fan asked Max Buck on his Twitter if him or his brother were included in the match. He replied: "Truthfully, I wish I knew." (wrestling may matter in TNA these days, but it seems organization still doesn't); Robbie E claimed on his Twitter the participants will be announced on tomorrow's Impact. Regardless, TNA's Ultimate X matches are usually good, assuming they stick a few of the current crop of guys in there.
Of the rest of the card, which looks promising: Joe vs Kazarian should be a decent bout, and Joe often steps up his game when put in there with someone good. Rob Van Dam and Jerry Lynn had some spectacular matches in the past, but with Lynn only recently recovering from back surgery, it remains uncertain if the two can put on anything on par with their previous classics. Styles vs Daniels will no doubt be great. Only way these two could have a bad match was if they took some of Jeff Hardy's secret stash beforehand. In the X division contract bout, Low Ki, Jack Evans, Zema Ion, and Austin Aries will fight it out in a bid to qualify for food stamps win a TNA contract. Finally Brian Kendrick will take a break from spinning wild conspiracy theories and attempt to win back the honor of the X division by defeating Abyss. Who may also be a member of the Illuminati and one of the people who faked Osama's death. Possibly.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This show is all about saving money. I’d bet my house Hogan and Bischoff were against it but Janice liked the idea because then they can pay the cheaper X-Division guys (and few has-been/never-were indy guys like Lynn and Shiima) to appear instead of the bigger names.
by The Fallen Angel on Jul 6, 2011 4:05 PM EDT reply actions
What is going to be interesting is when the PPV numbers come in. this has the potential to be what to WWE. Back then they had a certain faction that was against the PPV and did their best to undermine it. Just like that show we have EB on it doing everything to undermine it. If it sells, he can say his character help get it over. if it fails he can say he told you so and further bury the division. If they just let the guys go, similar to Hardcore Justice, I think this can be a success.
This could help to bring back some of the fans that have been turned off in the past year or two. Plus, Austin Aries on a PPV is good enough for me.
errrrrrrr
“And a chance for the 90s nostalgia crew to prove once and for all these younger guys with all the fancy moves can’t draw”
Oh yeah because people are churning out in droves to see Sting and Matt Hardy…..? Remember when Hogan was virtually crapping out 4.0 ratings before those X guys came round?
by Anthony Steven Lewis on Jul 6, 2011 4:51 PM EDT reply actions
Wow.
First, it’s “Turning out in droves,” unless your audience happens to be Amish.
Second, Sting is 52, Hardy is 36. Both of their movesets have been the same for about the last decade, Sting for the last two and a half decades. You citing them as the “younger guys” shows your complete idiocy.
Third, TNA has never, ever, ever, pulled a 4.0 rating. Hogan hasn’t popped one since his last Vince McMahon Extortion Tour.
Fourth, TNA was getting TWICE the PPV buys five-six years ago on word of mouth alone, mostly due to those “X Guys,” and how they were booked, versus the WWE-lite presentation they have now. WCW also used them as the cornerstone for their ratings as well. ECW used them almost exclusively for years, because it was seen as a legitimate competition. More sport, less entertainment, and it worked. Almost every other organization outside the WWE and TNA follows this formula, chiefly the UFC.
They wouldn’t be going back to this formula if they weren’t desperate. It’s what they did in WCW 2000-2001 when they came up with the CW Tag Titles. They always return to the formula that got them to the dance when the last song’s playing.
Please do us all a favor and actually watch what wrestling was, before you try and tell anyone what wrestling should be.
If it’s a test than it’s already passed in flying colors, the fact is the last time that I ordered a TNA ppv was during the very short Russo era. I have no idea where this continued myth about him being the reason why TNA is booked so poorly since the only time that he’s had free reign to book TNA we got Joe-Styles-Daniels 3 and the great Wolfe vs. Angle feud. Hopefully they’ll give him the reigns again for that one night and we can see a ppv that is actually worth the money something that neither company has had in a long time imo.
I don't watch TNA, but my dad and half-brother do, and I sometimes watch it on TiVo when I'm staying over at his place
I’m generally unimpressed with everything TNA does, except for their tag-team division, which they seem to generally know how to do (unlike WWE). The particular episode I was watching, they were having an X Division contract match, or something to that effect, with a few different guys. I gotta say, it was impressive. Everything else they had on that show, I was only mildly interested in. That match, though? Impressive.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
3rd Place- 2011 AAOP Contest
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jul 9, 2011 1:48 PM EDT reply actions
This is the first...
TNA PPV I’ll be buying in about five years.
Is there going to be a PBP post?
by Sergio Hernandez on Jul 10, 2011 6:55 PM EDT reply actions

by 
















