WWE accused of lobbying to keep UFC banned in Connecticut
Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the proximity to New York, its stuffy image and being the home state of WWE, Connecticut is one of the few American states that still bans mixed martial arts events including UFC from being held in their jurisdiction. However, as Connecticut political journalist Daniela Altimari reports and James Caldwell publicised in the professional wrestling media, this may soon change thanks to Democratic State Representative Matthew Lesser introducing a bill to legalise and regulate MMA in Connecticut. Proving that fan lobbying of politicians can really work, Lesser's bill was introduced thanks to a local MMA fan who brought the issue to his attention and convinced him of how illogical and financially counterproductive the current MMA ban is:
Lesser said he was spurred to raise the bill by a constituent who is an MMA fan.
"It doesn't seem to make sense to tell fans from Connecticut that they have to leave the state to watch it,'' he said during a brief interview Friday afternoon. MMA matches have been held at the state's casinos, but cannot be legally held elsewhere in Connecticut.
Lesser says MMA could also boost the state's bottom line. Average ticket sales for an Ultimate Fight Championship match topped $2.8 million in 2007. UFC, the company that promotes most of the top-ranked MMA matches, is also a major player in the pay-per-view market. Taxes on MMA gate receipts could provide "a pretty significant economic boom,'' he said.
Massachusetts and Maine both recently legalized MMA, but New York is one of four states that has not. That provides an opportunity for Connecticut, given its proximity to the Empire State, Lesser said.
Later in the article, Lesser accused WWE of lobbying against his bill, while WWE spokesman Robert Zimmerman denied it claiming that WWE is not opposed to "this or anything else the state wants to do with regards to sports or entertainment".
So who should we believe, Lesser or Zimmerman? Given WWE's track record, it is virtually impossible to believe Zimmerman's story. Vince McMahon has already sought to get UFC banned in key European countries like Germany, so it would be hardly surprising that he would lobby to keep them banned in his company's home state. It's not like the company is averse to spending dollars lobbying against legislation, as OpenSecrets.org revealed that WWE spent $1 million lobbying against federal legislation from 1999-2009, after Linda McMahon had "misspoke" about lobbying to Tea Party activists last October. Poor Robert Zimmerman has also been put in a position to lie far too many times by WWE already from claiming that The Undertaker's severe burns from a pyrotechnic mishap "basically amounted to a sunburn", to saying that Martha Hart's recent lawsuit was "nothing more than pure political orchestration", to his easily disproved proclamation that WWE never terminates anyone while injured, etc. Connecticut MMA fans should be thankful that Linda McMahon failed to be elected last November, because as a United States Senator she could have used her power to impede, maybe even block Lesser's bill.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting stuff here
Didn’t UFC have shows in Connecticut back in the pre-TUF days?
The only good bug is a dead bug!
Yeah, as did IFL
Mohegun Sun is a great venue, I saw a bunch of IFL shows there as well as UFC 55.
Liver Kick, formerly HKL
Twitter @LiverKick
You'd think after the Linda campaign that WWE wouldn't have the stroke to do anything to UFC
The McMahon’s have pretty close ties to UFC with Shane almost defecting there and Dana White always going on and on about his conversations with Vince. I wouldn’t blame WWE for trying to block UFC in Connecticut but I just don’t think they care right now. The final frontier for UFC is NY and that will happen this year, Connecticut will clear them too to have the casino’s pop numbers. No way WWE has more lobbyists or stroke than the casino’s which rake in billions for Connecticut so to me this is a non story.
I think it was just a smart ploy by Lesser to shout WWE to give the impression that those not voting for UFC is on WWE payroll.
Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...
I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell to you. May I sit?
"Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment."
-Lao Tzu
Sure
If your telling me that WWE has more lobbying power than the casinos in CT then you can sell me whatever you like.
Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...
that'll be 25K please.
"Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment."
-Lao Tzu
Ok I'll play with you fool. You must mean 25 cents
Lets leave Mohegan Sun out of the equation and just use Foxwoods as an example. Foxwoods handed over 1.7 billion dollars in a ten year period ‘92-’02 for the state of CT. They give the state an average of 200 million a year since 2007 and a total of 9.1 BILLION DOLLARS as of 2008.
Foxwoods and their new MGM Grand facility wants UFC, Mohegan Sun wants UFC. There isn’t a snowballs chance in hell Vince McMahon could stop that nor does he have more lobbying power in CT than these casinos. Only a damn fool would even think Vince has more power than they do. Foxwoods rakes in over a billion a year! Can you imagine how much cash is being given to lobbyists by Foxwoods!
Casinos will get UFC period and WWE ain’t got the clout or the cash to stop them.
Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...
No. 25K.
Foxwoods and Mohegan are on native land. Not Connecticut
"Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment."
-Lao Tzu
LMAO
Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun are on Native land!!!!!! That’s your argument? Ok except that anything done on native land still needs state approval and BTW why is Foxwoods paying the state 25% of their slots? Also why did Foxwoods and Mohegan sun need state approval to be built in the 1st place?
Forget 25 cents…you’d give the bridge straight up for nothing cuz you have no idea what you’re talking about…lol. Back to wrestling RoyalB tell me about a dusty finish.
Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...
Shane failing to buy his way into the UFC doesn’t really make for a close tie between the two organizations though. If anything, it could even be used to support the notion that it’s open season for the WWE in putting up road blocks to slow down the growth of MMA the UFC since it’s clear they won’t make any money off of it. It certainly ties in with the reports of the WWE interfering w/ their international expansion in Germany.
While it’s constantly put forth by the fans and even the companies themselves that the UFC and the WWE are two different animals, I think it’s clear that there’s a significant PPV audience that the two share (or rather, shared) and are in fact competing over. In hindsight, I’m fairly confident that McMahon would have nixed the current MMA boom in the bud by killing TUF before it started if McMahon had been a little more ahead of the curve.
I do agree that if they get NY, Connecticut will follow suit, McMahon or no McMahon. But I don’t think it’s such a given for this year as you imply. There’s still considerable resistance there. Recently, even Dana White, who never stops hyping that big network deal that never materializes, has currently given up on predicting when it will do a show in NY due to the new governor Andrew Cuomo leaving out any kind of measures to legalize MMA in his 2011-2012 budget proposal.

by 
















