Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

WWE Network details emerge: Channel to reach 40 million homes and feature other sports properties?

Photo

Vince McMahon is once again putting all his eggs in one basket and hoping to hit a home run by unleashing the WWE Network on the world sometime in 2012. The initial target date was for right around WrestleMania 28, which would seemingly be the perfect time to capitalize thanks to The Rock's presence at an event that is expected to be the biggest in the history of the company.

Confusion has reigned supreme for months now, though, namely due to the fact that details have been few and far between regarding how exactly WWE plans on rolling this channel out. Rumors abounded that YouTube's new initiative to pay for exclusive content would result in an Internet only channel but that may not be the case.

SportsBusinessDaily.com has some details:

Following nearly a decade of successful channel launches by most major sports properties, the WWE is deep into negotiations with In Demand on a deal that would see the wrestling operation launch its cable channel in early spring, according to numerous media and sports industry sources.

WWE executives have told cable and satellite operators that it is expecting to reach 40 million homes for its April 1 launch, an impressive number that would put the channel on par with sports networks like Fuel and Fox Soccer.

To achieve that distribution number, WWE would still have to cut carriage deals with more than just In Demand, a consortium of the nation's biggest cable operators: Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox and Bright House Networks.

Using a blueprint that other sports properties have worked with successfully, WWE plans to seed its channel with live events that previously have been available on pay-per-view. WWE also has expanded its programming search beyond wrestling, sources said. That could include some professional team sports, sources said.

The report goes on to state that Comcast is taking the lead in negotiations of the deal, likely because it has a vested interest in keeping WWE on USA with its Monday Night Raw television show, which consistently draws great ratings each week.

200 employees have been hired to staff the network and while a network head has yet to be named, Daily makes note that candidates have been told reality-show experience is preferred.

Perhaps that's why so many of the television show ideas have been reality based. The success of reality TV is still relatively high and it's a cheap, easy way to fill programming slots.

The most interesting bit of information to come out of the report, however, is how the current pay-per-view schedule would be affected:

The planned channel's marquee programming would come from most of, if not all of, WWE's current pay-per-view events. The company generally produces 13 PPV events per year. Most will migrate to the channel. It's not known how many would remain PPV.

As our own Keith Harris noted recently, WWE's "B-shows" have been drawing less and less year after year. They still make money but at the current rate it makes far more sense to use the shows as value adds for an easy selling point to the channel. If WWE cut down to four or five shows a year, the "Big Four" of Royal Rumble, WrestleMania, SummerSlam and Survivor Series, of course, would seemingly see an increase in business if fans didn't have to shell out money as often for pay-per-view they perceive as not worth the money.

Nothing is set in stone but the Network is coming together rapidly.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I really like the idea of only having 4 or 5 PPVs a year.

I mean, still have the B PPVs, but put them on WWE Network. That way people will feel more invested. I think I’d get WWE Network regardless, but I’m pretty positive I’d get it if they started having the non big 4 PPVs as an incentive.

by Kyle Rancourt on Dec 5, 2011 7:59 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed, I’ve been waiting for them to drop the PPV back down and would purchase all of them.
Can’t wait for the Network…

"Oldest ride, longest line!" - Ric Flair

by Doors Hate MMA Fighters on Dec 5, 2011 9:12 PM EST reply actions  

I wonder if a successful WWE network will allow the roster to be expanded. You’d think they would need a ton of bodies for say a tuesday night live show on WWE network while the main roster holds Raw and Smackdown together.

Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...

by Major on Dec 5, 2011 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

They already have folks getting no airtime

They could fill out a 2-hour show with who they have now. Of course, they have spoken of adding tag teams/cruiserweights, so we’ll see.

And in other news tonight...Voltron totally got served.

by GoForthAndDie on Dec 6, 2011 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

I think they have enough guys to make an entire show out of talent we never actually see on the two big shows

but the question is whether or not that would be worth spending the time on. Then again, Superstars and NXT would have a home and that takes care of a lot of the talent we don’t see now.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.

by Geno Mrosko on Dec 6, 2011 5:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d actually like them to make a third brand and put that on the WWE Network, this brand would be filled with guys who are lost in the shuffle in SD or Raw with a couple of top guys. A show geered more towards wrestling and storylines and less of the same crap that drags down the other shows would be nice and something that could find a home with people like myself who don’t think much of either show right now.

"@bigfootsilva, I want to tell you a joke so funny it will make your head grow. It goes like this..Oh wait, I see you have already heard it." -Chael Sonnen

by Raker on Dec 10, 2011 2:28 PM EST reply actions  

What about those who are on Att and other cable providers. I have been a big fan of WWE since it first started being aired in TN.

by Wildman67 on Jan 3, 2012 8:37 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"Behind you there may be one, or there may be many, waiting to stick a knife in your back. But you don't have to worry about me ... I'll shoot you right between the eyes." -- Kevin Nash

The General

Solidsnake_small Geno Mrosko

Editors

Small Keith Harris

Bane2_small Jesse Holland

File1684_small Sergio Hernandez