On the brink of a world title, Daniel Bryan is doing better in the WWE than you think
My first exposure to Daniel Bryan -- for sake of clarity I'll address him as his current moniker -- was his now legendary three-way match with Christopher Daniels and Low Ki at Ring of Honor's (ROH) debut show.
Unfortunately, I was a few years behind the curve since I had stopped following wrestling for a few years beginning in the middle of 2001. That bad part about that was I missed a lot of great wrestling while the good part is that all of it was waiting for me to consume as quickly as possible.
I instantly took a shine to Bryan for a variety of reasons. One -- the most obvious -- being he's a fantastic wrestler, one of the best I've seen my entire life. Another is he has trained under Shawn Michaels and William Regal, two personal favorites of mine. So I was kind of surprised with myself when Cagesider Finian1 asked if I had seen his 2009 bout against Davey Richards and after going through the old mental filing cabinet, I came to the conclusion I hadn't.
Then I thought, "2009? Then that means..." Yep. Daniel Bryan hasn't even been in the WWE for two years and he's already poised to make his first world title run as the current Money in the Bank winner on Smackdown.
So tell me again how Vince McMahon is misusing Bryan because I'm not seeing it.
Bryan properly debuted with the WWE as part of the first season of NXT in February of 2010. He had signed with the company in the middle of the previous year but stayed on with ROH until the end of 2009. When he finally showed up on their faux-reality show, the company made no attempt to hide his independent notoriety and in fact used that as a talking point for Michael Cole who doubted that the "American Dragon" could cut it on the sport's biggest stage.
February 2010 ... less than two years ago. I think I have some Chinese takeout in the fridge older than that.
And last night (Nov. 25), Bryan was put ring in the middle of the top feud on Smackdown. That's pretty impressive, right? It's even more impressive when you consider the WWE career of fellow ROH alumni CM Punk.
Punk spent nearly a year in developmental territories after signing in 2005 before making his television debut for the now defunct ECW brand. It would be another two years before he won Money in the Bank which led to his first World Heavyweight Championship reign.
Should Bryan cash in at WrestleMania 28, he will accomplish in around two years what it took Punk three to do. Granted, the "American Dragon" likely has a debt of gratitude to pay to Punk. The "Straight Edge Messiah" has helped break down doors and shatter glass ceilings much like Bret Hart and Shawn Michaels did nearly two decades ago.
Back then, if you weren't living inside a Gold's Gym with a needle sticking out your backside, you weren't sniffing a title shot. The steroid trial of the early '90s forced Vince McMahon to -- at least partially -- clean up his locker room and push a smaller, more natural looking wrestler.
While that change in attitude was one made of necessity due to legal matters, Punk's rise through the ranks has been one made to ensure financial stability. Creative is dead on arrival, ratings are stagnant, and buyrates are down. While it seems the WWE couldn't care less about the first and the second isn't as huge a deal as one would believe, the third is really alarming and an issue that McMahon wants to solve sooner rather than later.
Shaking up the main event scene by injecting a fresh face into it was one solution they came up with. Bringing back old faces -- like The Rock -- was another. Bryan is unaffected by the latter but he has everything to gain because of the former.
So without Punk's ascent, Bryan's might not be happening. That argument could be made, definitely. So let's take a look at another interesting comparison; that would be to John Cena. The longtime poster boy for the WWE didn't start off that way. Cena also spent some time in Ohio Valley Wrestlng (OVW) before getting the call up to the big leagues, something Bryan wasn't forced to do. And also -- like Punk -- Cena spent three years moving from bottom of the pack to mid-tier title to finally world champion.
Cena didn't have the same stigma Punk had or Bryan has. He's big, muscular, good-looking ... everything the WWE would want in a star. He's also a WWE homegrown talent and doesn't have the bingo hall stink on him. And yet, Bryan still might grab the brass ring in less time than "The Doctor of Thuganomics."
Bryan only spent a month in developmental -- at his own request -- when other indie darlings like Punk and the recently signed Claudio Castagnoli spent up to a year learning the WWE style. Going from a company like ROH right to a WWE ring is nearly unheard of.
The complaints -- and they have been lobbed at Punk as well -- have been at Bryan has been booked poorly. That he hasn't been given a fair shake. But since his debut -- less than TWO years ago -- he has won the United States Championship and a Money in the Bank title shot.
That doesn't sound like someone who is being misused.
It sounds like someone who is being groomed.
33 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
excellent write up. It really puts it into perspective when you think about the success he’s had in such a short time. Sure he was buried by Michael Cole every week, but he’s accomplished more than most of the guys in the locker room – and in less than two years time. I suspect he’ll be the first to not win the title with the MITB, but he’ll have his day to reign supreme over the WWE sooner than most think.
So tell me again how Vince McMahon is misusing Bryan because I’m not seeing it.
I’m assuming you didn’t see this weeks Smackdown, but even ignoring that, this statement flat out isn’t true.
When you have the play by play commentator constantly make jokes about how much of a loser a guy is, you’re not using him correctly. The crowd doesn’t react anymore when Danielson comes out, as shown by every time he comes out to have a match live and the crowd doesn’t react at all. This nonsense with Cole is killing Danielson, and he might never get over because of it.
Not to mention that winning the world title in modern day WWE doesn’t mean you’re getting a push, or going to get over. As evident by the disastrous Jack Swagger, Miz, and Dolph Ziggler title reigns.
I’m assuming you didn’t see this weeks Smackdown
The Smackdown in which he submitted the IC champion to become the number one contender for Mark Henry’s World Heavyweight championship? And he currently “Mr. Money in the Bank”, go figures.
"Don't be limited by fixed ideas nor by some trifling common sense...break the standards!"
by The One Who Wears The Crown on Nov 26, 2011 12:17 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
I saw a Smackdown where Dragon has been jobbing for months on end, and went back on his word for the MiTB cash in. This doesn’t even touch on the fact that the play by play commentator has been calling him a loser for two years nonstop. How does beating a guy who’s spent his entire career since fighting DX as a jobber to the stars undo this shit?
I don't have a huge problem with Cole trashing him.
For one, its Michael Cole. Everybody hates him and doesn’t take him seriously. It’s almost a good thing if Cole dislikes you and tries to come up with reasons why you suck. Also, Booker and/or Josh is always contradicting him and putting Bryan over. Yeah, in a perfect world it wouldn’t be happening in the first place, but Cole’s pathetic commentary is not keeping him down.
by The so-called Beautiful on Nov 27, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions
Cole’s pathetic commentary is not keeping him down.
It is keeping Dragon down, the reactions on Smackdown mean nothing because the shows pops are sweetened, every time Dragon has been in a live PPV match, the crowd doesn’t react at all. Look at Dragon’s match with Wade Barrett at Summerslam during Dragon’s last PPV match, the crowd was dead as a doornail.
Cole’s commentary is very detrimental, just because a guy screaming thing is an asshole, it doesn’t mean that said asshole screaming the same point over and over again won’t do damage to the person they’re screaming about.
WWE believes the memory span of the wrestling fan is short
and in many cases they are correct. The fact that Rhodes jobbed to DX a few years back means nothing now that he is a credible heel mid-card champion with a good gimmick that is building heat. In a similar situation, his recent wins against good opponents (in this case, in a four-man match against three top Smackdown contenders) does help to erase some of the stink of the mostly-unpublicized losing streak.
I am afraid about the cash in and how it goes against his word as a babyface. His explanation was aired on WWE.com, but it was an iffy one at best. I’d like for them to give him some mic time to explain himself and mention why he tried to do what he did so he can build his babyface credibility back.
Fish Stripes, a Florida Marlins blog
Author, Baseball Prospectus Fantasy
by Michael Jong on Nov 27, 2011 3:10 PM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't call...
Miz’s run as champ disastrous. And Ziggler’s reign barely qualifies as a reign.
Swagger? Yeah, his run as champ was pretty forgettable but I think that was a matter of too much, too soon.
by Sergio Hernandez on Nov 26, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
Ziggler’s reign barely qualifies as a reign.
You don’t see the problem with this sentence? That’s why the reign was so bad in the first place.
Swagger? Yeah, his run as champ was pretty forgettable
You don’t see the problem with this sentence? That’s why the reign was so bad in the first place.
I wouldn’t call Miz’s run as champ disastrous
The Miz title reign is one of the worst things WWE ever booked. Miz won it off Orton after a seven man beatdown, struggled to beat Jerry Lawler in his first title defense, couldn’t even beat Orton by cheating, lost clean to Jerry Lawler in a tag match, and after finally putting down Jerry Lawler, Miz puts on the worst main event in Wrestlemania history against John Cena in a feud where he was such a third wheel he made Jericho’s Undisputed Title reign look well booked.
Miz only ever main evented two PPV’s while he was champion anyway. John Cena was in the main event at every PPV Miz defended on (TLC, Royal Rumble, Elimination Chamber), or Miz was facing Cena in a match where he was the third wheel (Wrestlemania with Rocky, Extreme Rules with John Morrison). I’d feel sorry for Miz, but his matches as champion were so ungodly terrible that I never want to see him in the main event again.
Miz's title reign wasn't booked well
but calling it one of the worst things WWE has ever booked is giving WWE undue credit. It certainly could have been done better, but it wasn’t an abject disaster. Miz, for his part, attempted to keep the heat in an otherwise poorly booked Cena / Miz feud that heavily involved the Rock for no reason.
The Ziggler comment was basically that the “reign” was an angle in the storyline, not a legitimate “reign.” Call that what you will, but I don’t see a major problem in that angle.
Swagger’s run was totally forgettable, and Sergio agrees with that.
However, that was then, and right now the WHC is being built up credibly in the hands of Mark Henry (though given your previous post, you are likely not of that opinion either), and that is what will make the title appear strong if and when Daniel Bryan does take the title.
Fish Stripes, a Florida Marlins blog
Author, Baseball Prospectus Fantasy
by Michael Jong on Nov 27, 2011 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
The thing about the Mark Henry title reign is that in order for Bryan Danielson to have enough credibility to give his title reign any meaning and erase months of bad booking, he’s going to have to have a really good match and pull out some really good mic-work to generate said credibilty.
Dragon can’t provide the mic work, so all that leaves is him having a really good match with Mark Henry, and that’s an impossibility. Even Rey Mysterio, a guy who’s offense doesn’t rely on him having to lift his opponents or tap his opponents at all, barely cracked the three star mark when facing Mark Henry, what do you think Dragon can provide when his submissions have been given little credibility, and he won’t be able to lift Henry off his ass? If anyone can have a three star match with Mark Henry, it’ll be Dragon, but he’s not going to get over because of it, and WWE has no intention to book him as important.
Bryan was such an overwhleming IWC favorite
that any slight to his character was bound to receive criticisms of Vince McMahon burying him. Sergio, you’re right in that the time it took for Bryan to get into the main event scene was staggeringly fast compared to other former ROHers. One can also point to guys like Seth Rollins / Tyler Black as another example of someone who is being worked in FCW for a long period of time before receiving his chance despite looking very good.
As I mentioned before, the title picture on Smackdown is working to perfection. Henry has been built up as such a credible champion that the wrestler who finally goes over on him will look amazing. If the Smackdown team plans on making Bryan that guy, he will be huge, regardless of what Cole says on commentary.
Fish Stripes, a Florida Marlins blog
Author, Baseball Prospectus Fantasy
uuummmm.....
Punk was pushed because of Benoit. Not because of stagnation.
"Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment."
-Lao Tzu
Don't need to read anything but the timeline.
They crowned Punk just around the time Congress started hearings.
"Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment."
-Lao Tzu
Ok, but what is your logic? That they pushed CMP at that time because he wasn’t on any kind of drug?
And his gimmick was that he was Straight Edge.
He was their new Brett Hart.
"Respond intelligently even to unintelligent treatment."
-Lao Tzu
Good article with good points
My porn name is HogOfHawkness
by HeartOfHawkness on Nov 26, 2011 2:23 PM EST reply actions
agreed
When Mike Ditka calculates pi it's decimal representation ends.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Nov 26, 2011 6:22 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Lets put it this way
when Daniel Bryan Danielson when the WHC the roof of whatever venue that match is held in will blow off. For my money he is the best technical wrestler in the WWE at this point in time.
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"YOU ARE A FACTORY OF SADNESS" Angry Browns fan
Canal Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
Yea, I think last night was a test run for Bryan.. the crowd went nuts when he won.. and he sold it like a pimp. I think the crowds are going to be invested in him as a champ.
by Rawuncutnxrated on Nov 26, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions
The WWE sent a lot of mixed signals with him
He’s gotten to where he is now despite constantly being ragged on and mocked. Don’t see what the point of all of that is/was, other than to make him more of an underdog, I guess.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!" Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 458 posts (08/24/11)
3rd Place- 2011 AAOP Contest
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Nov 26, 2011 4:51 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I think the mixed signals are a big part of why the IWC thinks he’s being used poorly. It’s a bit of confrimation bias, we only remember the worst parts. He had a huge losing streak on NXT — but he was one of the main characters, one of two breakout stars, and gained legitimacy in his matches against Batista and Miz. He had another losing streak post MITB, but now he’s inserted into the Henry/Show feud and headlining a Smackdown special.
Sometimes we forget to look at the larger timeline.
That's something I thought about when I was typing that
They made him look bad at times, presumably to subtly (or not so much) get the point across that the WWE > independent, smaller companies, but at the same time, having the guy who represents those independent companies beating your guys and being your champ doesn’t really get across that WWW >independent everyone else thing.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!" Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 458 posts (08/24/11)
3rd Place- 2011 AAOP Contest
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Nov 26, 2011 7:16 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
most internet marks
are just spoiled brats that will wine and complain all the time because their favorite guy is not champion or lost a match, why even pay attention to that kind of stuff? lol
So you do think that Bryan has been horribly booked this past year? I think he has jobbed to everybody on the roster with the exception of Hornswaggle. To make it worse, he did while he was US Champ and it made the belt look worse on top of it. There is nothing wrong with getting pinned but the way the WWE has done it made him look real bad. Not to mention the NXT angle that ended just made it painful to watch.
I think there is a better chance of Bryan being the first person to lose with a Money In the Bank title shot than win the belt. That is beside the fact that he just ain’t ready. He is bad on the mic and to be a World Champ I believe you should be at least a decent talker.
I think your memory is foggy
As US champion, he had a pretty substantial winning streak against guys like Rhodes, Dibiase, Ziggler and whoever else he worked it. He lost it to Sheamus, another guy getting a big push, but even without the title, when he lost, they protected him. They made his match with Chavo a time limit draw, his losses against Sin Cara were due to Hunico interference… it’s only since that Wade Barrett loss that he was being used to enhance other guys.
His angle since MITB has been his losing streak. Last week, Mark Henry was throwing him around the ring like a ragdoll, and this week, he had to be saved from a beatdown at the hands of Cody Rhodes by Randy Orton. Why are they giving him this title shot when there’s obviously zero chance that he’ll win based on the way he’s been booked? At this rate, I expect him to job to AJ next. I really thought the losing streak was a clever way to set up a slow-burn heel turn, but now it seems like it’s being dropped after serving to destroy any credibility he had as a submission machine. How can that be interpreted as grooming?
he has he damn mitb
he doesnt need to be credible to get the belt, look at del rio, he got it and he was being booked like a piece of shit weak weasel



















