Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Is the WWE Planning to Unify All of Their Titles Over the Next Year?

Photo

The Legend threw up a fanpost a few days ago in regards to whether or not the WWE plan on unifying all of their championship belts over the next year. He linked up to an article from Rajah that said this:

Creative plans as of Monday night was for WWE to unify all of its championships within the next year. There would be one World Championship, one Tag Team Championship, the Intercontinental Championship, and one Women's title. It is said that a WWE/World Title Unification Match will take place at next year's WrestleMania.

I commented in Legend's fanpost that this has been a long time coming, if it turns out to be true. They've already started the process along by booking the McCool-Melina match to unify the Women's and Diva's titles at Night of Champions, not to mention the fact that they unified the tag titles last month. It would make sense to start with the belts that mean the least and work their way up. I really hope that's what they are doing. It makes for intriguing matches at future PPV shows and having so many titles gives them all less meaning. Jim Ross agrees in his latest blog post:

I'm a proponent of unifying titles in pro wresting. Too many titles waters down the product in my view. When decision makers were still wrestling they would often create meaningless titles to appease egocentric performers or to enhance their own egos.

I can understand why the WWE decided to run things the way they've run things over the past so many years. The acquisition of WCW produced a serious lack of competition and an overload of talent with little time to squeeze everyone in. The natural decision was to split them over the two shows and work them separately. Of course, they couldn't sell Smackdown as it's own show without it's own titles. The whole thing was great in theory but they booked it wrong and it ended up bombing in practice. It appears that they are finally making the decision to absorb the titles into each other and likely with that merge the shows back together.

There are two reasons to do this. First, JR is right, too many titles really does water down the product and if everybody has a belt then no one does, right? Second, despite the fact that the WWE has gotten a lot younger over the past few years, they haven't built many stars. With HBK retired and the Undertaker also on his way out they're clearly trying to condense the amount of time they have to fill on television with some of these guys that aren't getting over. The more time they can give to the guys that sell, the better.

None of this is confirmed but I hope it turns out to be true. The Women unifying their titles is a step in the right direction. If they go through with it though that means we would likely lose the Big Gold Belt. I've always thought that was the best belt, even back when it first came about. No way does WWE get rid of their title and that's a shame because I'm sick of the spinner belt that doesn't spin. Too bad it sells so damn well.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting thought regarding the which belt will be kept

If you remember when the WCW and WWF belts were unified WWE had a completely new belt made. The Big Gold Belt as you call it, was brought back and given to Triple H. I fully expect WWE to do the same if they haven’t made one already since the “new” tag belts have been around for years but weren’t introduced until now.

Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...

by Major on Sep 4, 2010 8:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Egadz - I hope it doesn't happen.

I could care less about what happens to the other titles but the World Heavyweight Championship has way too much history to be folded into WWE Championship. I think it still holds a lot of prestige and still looks far more distinguished than Cena’s tacky abomination. But yeah, we all know…the toy replica sales are what matters here. Uggh. Shoot me now.

Well if and when they do this – I just hope they create a whole new belt that’s proper for the biggest pro wrestling company in the world.

It also makes me wonder how they can put on a unification match when the main event World Title challenger is the Royal Rumble winner. I feel it makes the match mean more when the challenger is looking to gain the title instead of already acquiring/unifying another one…if that makes sense.

by FighterHayabusa on Sep 4, 2010 12:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe they pull a...

RR ’92 and the Rumble is for either the WWE Championship or the World HW title?

Let’s say in this case, it’ll be the World HW title that’s vacated and up for grabs. Whoever wins (preferably a RAW guy in this case) the Rumble/World HW title comes out the next night and says this’ll be his last night on RAW since he’s going to Smackdown! as their champ. The WWE Champ comes out to congratulate him and wish him luck on Fridays when

NO CHANCE!!!

It’s Vince. He swaggers down the ramp and lays it all on the line and says the two of them will be facing each other at RassleMania to unify dem purdy belts.

God, I amaze myself sometimes.

Contributor, NorthTexasFisticuffs.com
Follow me on Twitter

by Applejack McNeil on Sep 4, 2010 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe they make it a triple threat match between Taker, Cena, and somebody else

by The Legend on Sep 4, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Since I started watching wrestling again (since February), I've been a proponent of getting rid of "brands"

and merging all of the titles is a major step.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 4, 2010 12:42 PM EDT reply actions  

One less item off the list of IWC demands so whats next?

End PG?
End the Brand Spilt?
POOSH the Cruiserweights?
MOAR Factions?

by rovert on Sep 4, 2010 12:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Man, here's the thing about PG...

They can push the FUN FOR THE WHOLE FAMILY angle all they want but some dumbass 9-year old kid isn’t gonna shell out $45 for a PPV, $55 to see Undertaker’s laser scars on his Adam’s apple in HD.

They’ll have to plead with mama and dadda to buy it but like my mom did to me, they’ll probably just tell them to fuck off and that they can watch “it” (“it” meaning wrestling) the next night.

So their PPV numbers are shit.

What they NEED to do is find some kind of common ground between this horseshit that’s on my TV right now and the product when chicks were giving birth to hands and Kane was fucking dead chicks or whatever.

Something that won’t turn the parents away OH WON’T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN but also get that good 18-49 money.

Contributor, NorthTexasFisticuffs.com
Follow me on Twitter

by Applejack McNeil on Sep 4, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Word.

I’m a lifelong fan of wrestling and when I was 6 back in 1990, I couldn’t get my parents to shell out money for a PPV for the life of me. My friend’s kids actually watch TNA because they think the WWE if for little kids, and they’re 9 and 7! They just don’t know that TNA sucks too I guess.

When I watch WWE nowadays, especially Smackdown, I really hope that they change this PG crap sooner or later.

by SilverNBlackZach! on Sep 4, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not until

the Senate campaign with Linda is over. If she wins we could be in for the PG shit for a long time.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 4, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bah, she’s not gonna win. I suspect we’ll still have to put up with the PG shit after anyways.

by Parallex on Sep 4, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ill never fail to be bemused by the strong anti-PG sentiment on the net. Like a few swears would dramaticly improve things.

by rovert on Sep 4, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not to mention

I don’t think cursing is the big issue here. Although it was nice to have guys like Stone Cold come out and say, “Shut up, Vince, you little bastard, before I whip your ass”. I can connect to that more than I can connect to a guy saying, “I am better than you and I will defeat you”.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 4, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Id argue that your problems lies more in the writing rather the age rating of shows.

by rovert on Sep 4, 2010 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

The PG rating really hinders the writing.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 4, 2010 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Big Time

When I watch these guys cut promos, they’re pretty limited in what they are able to say and the writing comes off like something Raffi wrote sometimes.

by SilverNBlackZach! on Sep 4, 2010 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

How would a PG rating have affected, say, Watts’ Mid-South/UWF or WCW till about 1999?

by kaufman316 on Sep 4, 2010 7:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

WWF was PG

When HBK threw Jannetty through a plate glass window, When Jack the Snake had a cobra bite Randy Savage!!

Lets be real the company has been tv-14 for a really short period of time compared to what historically the WWF had been prior to the change in ‘97-’98

Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...

by Major on Sep 4, 2010 7:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Early 90's WWF was also garbage.

Until guys like Stone Cold, Rock, and DX came along and Vince & Co. started doing things more interesting than the nWo.

by The so-called Beautiful on Sep 4, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wrestling

has also been at it’s best when the storylines were the most realistic.

Forget it Donny, you're out of your element.
CagesideSeats.com
Follow me on Twitter at GenoMrosko

by Geno Mrosko on Sep 4, 2010 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

"Behind you there may be one, or there may be many, waiting to stick a knife in your back. But you don't have to worry about me ... I'll shoot you right between the eyes." -- Kevin Nash

Managers

Solidsnake_small Geno Mrosko

Editors

Small Keith Harris

Garth-knight_small Jesse Holland

File1684_small Sergio Hernandez